ARTICLE WRITING GUIDE:
Articles must have required parts that followed next criteria:
– General formulation of the problem and its connection with important scientific and practical tasks.
– Analysis of recent researches and publications, which dealt with aspects of the problem and were used by the author; allocation unresolved parts of the general problem.
– Formulation of the purposes of the article (problem description).
– Presentation of the main research material with full justification of scientific results.
– Conclusion of the study and the prospects for further research in this direction.
– LastName_direction_town (e.g. Stuart_pedagogy_Edinburg)
Total volume: 3-5 pages of printed text A-4 size (up to the list of references).
Standards: font Times New Roman, font size – 10, line spacing – 1, paragraph indent – 0.5 cm, all margins – 2 cm, list of references – IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE IN THE TEXT (not less than 20 titles), the text processor MS Word, type file – document Word 97-2003 (it is obligatory).
Keywords (three lines) and abstract (at least 150-200 words) in English and Russian.
Non-breaking spaces between the numbers, initials and surname.
Do not confuse the hyphen (-) and the intra-word dash (-).
Formulas are made through the formula editor «MathType» or «Microsoft Equation», the size of characters – 10 (it is obligatory), the length of the formulas should not exceed 80 mm (it is obligatory), Roman characters are typed in italic font, Greek characters – right font).
Figures made in vector graphics are to be placed in single object or grouped. Scanned drawings must be scanned with the resolution at least 300 dpi.
The maximum number of figures in an article is 4, tables – 4, formulas – 4 (exceeding the number should be agreed with the editorial board).
Dear authors, PLEASE comply with the requirements for article formatting.
Don't come up with periods, commas, abbreviations, etc. where they are not (see SAMPLE).
Do not replace letters of the same type in the Cyrillic and Latin alphabet in words – THEY SEE THEM in the download program in the RSCI.
Keywords: Abstract. e – mail: – write as in the sample.
1. To determine the UDC, you can use the following links:
2. For the translation into Russian or other languages, you can use the following links (but be sure to give at proofreading to competent translator):
A) http://translate.yandex.ru/ (translates patronymic and degrees)
3. To check the article on anti-plagiarism (verification required) link:
A) http://www.antiplagiat.ru/index.aspxl (results are stored by the author and are available to editors on request)
SEE SAMPLES if the question arises!
Writing a journal in English (as they are presented in Scopus and in the Web of Science (WoS) – a different spelling of the name of the journals will lead to the fact that the link to the article will not be attached to the journal) “Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology".
THE QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM:
The journal has a strict quality control system. Every paper submitted for publishing in journal “Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology" shall be reviewed.
Reviewing is blind (anonymous) on one side – the reviewer knows the names of the authors, while the authors do not know the names of the reviewers.
Within one day after the paper submission, the authorized secretary shall forward the paper to Deputy Editor responsible for a corresponding science field to select reviewers, who can be appointed from specialists with PhD or Doctor degree in the respective field of science. The members of the Editorial Board can be reviewers as well.
The Deputy Editor chooses a reviewer within three days. The authorized secretary forwards the manuscript to the reviewer within one day.
The reviewer makes a review (fill in the form below), and he or she e-mails it to the authorized secretary (ANIemail@example.com) within 3 weeks after he or she receives the paper.
The reviewer can recommend the paper to be accepted for publication; recommend it to be accepted for publication with revision; or recommend to decline the paper. If the reviewer recommends the paper to be accepted for publication with revision, or recommends the paper to be declined, he or she is to provide reasons for such decision in the review.
If the paper is recommended for publication with revision, the authorized secretary shall forward the review to the author for revision.
Upon receiving the revised paper the authorized secretary forwards the manuscript it to the same reviewer for another review within one day.
In case the material is declined, the authorized secretary e-mails the review to the author and points out the possibility of repeated reviewing at the author’s discretion. The reviewer’s name will be revealed to the author only by a written consent of the reviewer.
In case the paper is rejected for the second time, the authorized secretary e-mails the review to the author. The paper can not be reviewed more than two times.
The paper is forwarded for technical editing after reviewing. The Technical Editor can reject the paper and send it to the author for revision to make sure it meets all formal and technical requirements. The paper can be rejected by the Editor-in-Chief/Editor responsible for a specific science field for the reasons of his or her disagreement with the review, discovered conflict of interests, or violation of ethics.
Most common reasons for declining:
– the paper has poor or incorrect structure
– the paper is not enough detailed for readers to fully understand the analysis offered by the authors
– the paper has no scientific novelty
– the paper has not enough relevant references
– the paper contains theories, concepts or conclusions that are not properly substantiated by necessary data, argumentations or information
– the paper does not provide detailed enough description of methods and materials, which would allow other researchers to repeat the experiment
– the paper lacks clear descriptions or explanations of verifiable hypotheses, details and stages of experiments, examples of statistical or experimental samples
– the paper gives poor description of conducted experiments, or contains errors and mistakes, or does not include statistical analysis
– the paper is written with the language that does not meet the requirements to a scientific paper
– the paper contains unsubstantiated criticism towards the existing fundamental propositions, generally accepted theories and facts
– the paper has an expressed political character, and contains statements and appeals inconsistent with generally accepted norms.
IF YOUR PAPER WAS DECLINED
– consider all the points that the editor and the reviewer have commented on;
– describe all the revisions made to your paper in your cover letter;
– conduct all additional experiments or analyses recommended by the reviewer (if you are sure that those changes will not make your paper better, please substantiate this opinion in detail);
– in the cover letter describe all the reviewer’s comments you agree with, and those you disagree with;
– provide polite and scientific substantiation of all the comments you do not agree with;
– please highlight all revisions and changes you made in your paper;
– send the revised manuscript together with your cover letter within the period of time set by the editor.
It is better not to choose another journal for your publication, unless either of the following happened:
– the editor sent you an answer that the subject matter of your paper does not fit the journal
– your paper was declined even after you have revised each comment and recommendation of the reviewer
– your paper was declined by two reviewers or the editor
– the process of manuscript consideration takes much more time than the journal standard procedure, and the editors can not expedite it. In this case, it is very important that you notify the editors that you decided not to publish your paper in this journal before you submit the paper for publishing in another journal.
Publication of a paper is a complicated process, and you are expected to be ready to work on your paper making sure consider every comment made by reviewers and editors and make necessary changes to your manuscript.
The author(s) independently sending the scientific article, undertake the following obligations: they transfer the journal’s editions non-exclusive rights to use the scientific article by reproducing it, using the scientific article as whole or fragmentarily in combination with any text, photographs or drawings, full-text network versions of the numbers on the website of the journal.
The author(s) is (are) responsible for the misuse in the scientific article of intellectual property objects, copyright objects or “know-how” in full in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.
The author(s) confirm that the article being sent is published first time and was not sent in another journals.
The author(s) agrees to process their personal data in accordance with Art. 6 of the Federal Law “On Personal Data” of July 27, 2006, No. 152-FZ, namely: surname, name, second name, scientific degree, academic title, position, place(s) of work and/or training, contact information at the place of work and/or training, with a goal to publishing the article in the journal. The author (s) confirm that the scientific article being sent does not contain data or information with limited access and that it does not require the permission of the Ministry of Education or other ministries and departments for its publication.
The author(s) of the article is (are) familiar with and agree with the following conditions:
– the author’s rights for a scientific article belong to the author (s) of this article;
– copyrights to the journal number (in whole) belong to the founder of the journal;
– the editorial board of the journal has the right to provide the scientific articles to Russian and foreign organizations that provide indexes of scientific citation;
– the editorial board of the journal has the right to make the necessary clarifications and abbreviations;
– remuneration (fee) for published articles is not paid, materials of scientific articles sent to the editorial office are not returned to , author (s).
However, the authors have the right to use all materials in their subsequent publications, if it provided that a reference is made to publications in our journal.
The author has the right to send submitted version, accepted version and published version to any repository of the author’s choice without an embargo.
The contents of the journal are licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC license.
Each article submitted for publication in the journal is checked for the originality of the text.
“Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology" uses the software “Antiplagiat. Expert" to detect cases of coincidence and similarity of the text in the submitted manuscripts.
The originality of the text of the article must be at least 75% (the text of the article must contain at least 8000 characters without spaces).
Before to check the article (check is required), use the Antiplagiat website (the results are kept by the author and sent at the request of the editorial board).
If, when typesetting in InDesign or uploading to the RSCI (they see everything), your article will find a replacement of the same type of letters from different alphabets, words are inserted in the form of formulas or incorrect characters are applied in words in order to increase the originality of the text (unfortunately Word and Antiplagiat of this do not see) – the article will be deleted, and all information will be transferred to your organization.
1) The Higher Attestation Commission has a negative attitude to articles written in co-authorship, and when there are more than one, even more so (with the exception of articles under a grant).
2) it is undesirable to use in the article partially already published material by you – either change it, or simply indicate in the text that this issue was considered by you there and there – otherwise we will have to subsequently retraction (withdrawal) of the article from the RSCI and the journal (DISSERNET is currently tracking such cases).
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS OF SUBMISSION OF THE MANUSCRIPT FOR PUBLICATION:
- The article is drawn up in accordance with the “Guide to the style of article writing" and submitted to the editorial office of the journal by the author himself.
- The finished article should be sent in electronic form to the Editorial Board of the journal “Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology" to the official e-mail address ANIfirstname.lastname@example.org (be sure to indicate the scientific direction).